In This Article
Why Transition from Type I to Type II?
You have your SOC 2 Type I report. Congratulations - you've demonstrated that your controls are suitably designed. But your customers, especially enterprise buyers, likely want more.
Type I: "Are your controls designed properly?" (point in time)
Type II: "Are your controls designed properly AND working?" (over time)
Customer Pressure
Most enterprise customers see Type I as a stepping stone, not a destination. Common responses to Type I include:
- "When will you have Type II?"
- "We'll accept Type I for now, but need Type II for renewal"
- "Type I is fine for pilot, but production requires Type II"
Type II Benefits
- Higher assurance: Proves controls actually work, not just exist
- Customer acceptance: Meets enterprise procurement requirements
- Fewer questionnaires: Type II answers more questions than Type I
- Real security improvement: Forces sustained control operation
Typical Transition Timeline
The transition from Type I to Type II isn't instantaneous - you need an observation period where controls operate.
Scenario: Type I in December 2025
| Phase | Timing | Activity |
|---|---|---|
| Type I Issued | December 2025 | Point-in-time report as of Dec 31, 2025 |
| Observation Period Starts | January 2026 | Begin operating and documenting controls |
| Observation Period Ends | June-December 2026 | 6-12 months of control operation |
| Type II Fieldwork | July-Jan 2027 | Auditor tests controls across the period |
| Type II Report | Aug-Feb 2027 | Report covering Jan-Jun or Jan-Dec period |
Minimum vs. Recommended Period
- Minimum: 6 months (some auditors accept 3 for first Type II)
- Recommended: 9-12 months for first Type II
- Standard: 12 months for subsequent years
A shorter observation period is not faster - it just means your Type II covers less time. Customers may ask about the gap between reports or why the period is so short.
The Practical Path: Step by Step
Step 1: Review Type I Findings
Your Type I audit likely identified areas to strengthen. Before starting the observation period:
- Address any exceptions noted in Type I
- Implement auditor recommendations
- Close any gaps that were accepted for Type I
Step 2: Establish Evidence Collection Processes
Type II requires evidence that controls operated throughout the period. Set up:
- Automated logging and retention
- Regular evidence exports (don't wait until audit time)
- Ticketing systems with proper documentation
- Calendar reminders for periodic controls
Step 3: Formalize Periodic Controls
Some controls execute periodically. Document schedules and owners:
- Access reviews (quarterly or semi-annual)
- Vulnerability scans (monthly or continuous)
- Backup testing (quarterly)
- Security awareness training (annual)
- Vendor assessments (annual)
- Risk assessments (annual)
Step 4: Communicate Responsibilities
Everyone involved needs to understand:
- What controls they own
- How to document control execution
- Where to report issues or exceptions
- That the observation period has started
Step 5: Monitor Throughout the Period
Don't set and forget. Actively monitor:
- Are periodic controls executing on schedule?
- Are exceptions being documented and addressed?
- Is evidence being collected properly?
- Have there been significant changes to systems?
Step 6: Prepare for Type II Fieldwork
4-6 weeks before audit:
- Organize evidence by control
- Identify any gaps in evidence
- Document any exceptions and remediation
- Brief control owners on the audit process
Control Maintenance During Observation
The observation period tests whether controls work consistently - not whether you can scramble to make them work when the auditor arrives.
What "Operating Effectively" Means
- Consistent: The control operates every time it should
- Complete: All required steps are performed
- Documented: Evidence exists that the control operated
- Timely: The control operates when it should (not after the fact)
Handling Changes During Observation
Your environment will change during the observation period. Handle changes by:
- Documenting significant changes to scope or systems
- Ensuring new systems are covered by controls
- Updating control documentation as processes change
- Communicating changes to your auditor
When Controls Fail
Control failures happen. What matters is how you handle them:
- Document the failure: What happened, when, how discovered
- Assess impact: What was the actual or potential consequence?
- Remediate: Fix the immediate issue
- Root cause: Why did the control fail?
- Prevent recurrence: What changes prevent future failures?
Most Type II reports have some exceptions. Isolated incidents with proper handling are usually acceptable. Systemic failures or unaddressed issues are problems.
Evidence Collection Best Practices
Types of Evidence Needed
| Control Area | Evidence Examples |
|---|---|
| Access Controls | Access request tickets, access reviews, termination checklists |
| Change Management | Change tickets, approvals, test results, deployment records |
| Monitoring | Alert logs, incident tickets, response documentation |
| Vulnerability Management | Scan reports, remediation tickets, patch records |
| Training | Completion records, training logs, acknowledgments |
| Backup/Recovery | Backup logs, restore test records, DR test results |
| Vendor Management | Assessment records, contracts, security reviews |
Evidence Collection Tips
- Automate where possible: System logs, automated tickets, scheduled exports
- Collect continuously: Don't wait for audit time
- Retain everything: You don't know what samples auditors will request
- Organize by control: Makes audit preparation faster
- Test your evidence: Can you actually retrieve what you need?
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
1. Starting Observation Before Ready
If controls aren't fully implemented, the observation period captures failures, not successes. Ensure controls are ready before the clock starts.
2. Inconsistent Control Execution
"We did it most months" isn't sufficient. Auditors sample across the period and expect consistent operation.
3. Lost or Missing Evidence
Can't prove it happened if you don't have evidence. Ensure retention policies cover the observation period.
4. Ignoring Exceptions
Exceptions happen, but unaddressed exceptions suggest control weakness. Document and remediate.
5. Major Changes Mid-Period
Significant system or process changes mid-observation create complexity. Plan changes around audit cycles when possible.
6. Last-Minute Scramble
If you're scrambling to find evidence the week before fieldwork, the period wasn't managed well. Plan ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can we use the same auditor for Type II?
Yes, and it's often easier. They already understand your environment from Type I. However, you're free to switch auditors.
What if we have gaps in evidence?
Gaps in evidence typically result in exceptions. If you discover gaps mid-period, fix the collection process going forward. Explain gaps honestly to your auditor.
Can the observation period overlap with Type I?
Technically yes - the observation period can start before the Type I report is issued. However, it's cleaner to start after Type I confirms controls are ready.
What if we add new systems during observation?
New systems should be covered by your controls. Document when they came into scope and ensure controls applied from that point forward.
How do we handle an exception we can't fix?
If a control exception cannot be remediated (e.g., a system limitation), document the exception, assess the risk, and implement compensating controls if possible. Discuss with your auditor.