The Quick Answer

Type I reports on whether controls are designed appropriately at a specific point in time.

Type II reports on whether controls are designed appropriately AND operating effectively over a period of time (typically 6-12 months).

Bottom Line

Most enterprise customers want Type II. Type I is useful as a stepping stone or for customers with lower security requirements, but sophisticated buyers see Type I as "we have policies" vs. Type II as "we actually follow them."

Detailed Comparison

Aspect SOC 2 Type I SOC 2 Type II
What's tested Design of controls Design AND operating effectiveness
Time coverage Single point in time (e.g., "as of December 31") Period of time (e.g., "January 1 - December 31")
Audit question "Are controls suitably designed?" "Are controls designed AND working?"
Testing methods Inquiry, observation, inspection Inquiry, observation, inspection, re-performance, sampling
Sample testing No (design only) Yes (samples from entire period)
Typical timeline 2-4 months (readiness + audit) 9-15 months (readiness + 6-12 month period + audit)
Typical cost $15,000-40,000 $30,000-100,000+
Assurance level Lower (intent, not execution) Higher (proven track record)
Customer acceptance Some accept; many prefer Type II Strongly preferred by enterprise
Ongoing requirement Often a one-time stepping stone Annual renewal expected

When to Choose Type I

Type I makes sense in specific situations:

1. First-Time SOC 2 (Bridge Report)

You need something to share with customers while building the track record for Type II. Type I demonstrates you've invested in controls and can satisfy customers who don't require Type II.

2. Urgent Customer Requirement

A deal requires SOC 2 faster than Type II allows. Type I can be achieved in 2-4 months vs. 9-15 months for Type II.

3. Lower-Risk Use Cases

Some customers (particularly SMBs or lower-risk engagements) accept Type I. If your customer base doesn't demand Type II, it may suffice.

4. Major System Changes

After significant infrastructure changes, a Type I report establishes the new baseline before accumulating operating history for Type II.

Type I Limitations

  • Doesn't prove controls actually work in practice
  • Sophisticated customers may not accept it
  • May need to explain why you don't have Type II
  • Creates expectation to "upgrade" to Type II

When to Choose Type II

Type II is the right choice for most organizations pursuing SOC 2 seriously:

1. Enterprise Customer Requirements

Fortune 500 companies, financial institutions, and healthcare organizations typically require Type II. It's table stakes for enterprise deals.

2. Long-Term Credibility

Type II demonstrates sustained commitment to security, not just a point-in-time compliance exercise.

3. Competitive Differentiation

When competitors only have Type I (or nothing), Type II sets you apart.

4. Genuine Security Improvement

The observation period forces you to actually operate controls consistently, improving real security posture.

Type II Considerations

  • Requires longer timeline (plan ahead)
  • Higher cost (but better value per dollar)
  • Must maintain controls consistently (no gaps)
  • Exceptions are documented (can't hide issues)

The Customer Perspective

Understanding how customers evaluate SOC 2 reports helps you choose wisely.

What Enterprise Customers Think

Report Type Customer Perception
No SOC 2 "Not serious about security; requires extensive review"
Type I "Getting started; has policies but unproven execution"
Type II (first year) "Committed to security; building track record"
Type II (multiple years) "Mature security program; proven track record"

Common Customer Questions

  • "Why only Type I?" Be prepared to explain your Type II timeline
  • "When will you have Type II?" Have a concrete answer
  • "Were there any exceptions?" Type II discloses these; be ready to discuss

Recommended Strategy

For most organizations, we recommend this approach:

Option A: Direct to Type II (Recommended)

If you can wait 9-15 months for your first report:

  1. Complete readiness and implement controls
  2. Begin observation period (minimum 6 months, ideally 9-12)
  3. Undergo Type II audit at period end
  4. Renew annually with 12-month Type II reports

Best for: Organizations planning ahead without urgent customer pressure

Option B: Type I Bridge to Type II

If you need something faster:

  1. Implement controls and get Type I report (2-4 months)
  2. Share Type I with customers, explaining Type II timeline
  3. Continue operating controls through observation period
  4. Get Type II report (6-12 months after Type I)
  5. Renew annually with Type II

Best for: Organizations with immediate customer requirements

Option C: Type I Only

Rarely recommended, but may work if:

  • Your customers genuinely accept Type I
  • You're a small/early-stage company with limited resources
  • Type II is planned for the future

Think of Type I as training wheels. It's fine to start with, but plan to take them off. Staying at Type I signals you're not ready for enterprise-grade security scrutiny.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I skip Type I and go straight to Type II?

Yes, absolutely. Many organizations go directly to Type II. Type I is not a prerequisite; it's an option for those who need something faster.

How long should my Type II observation period be?

For first-time reports, 6 months is the minimum most auditors accept. 9-12 months is preferred as it demonstrates full-cycle control operation. Subsequent years typically cover 12 months.

Can I convert a Type I to Type II?

Not directly. After receiving Type I, you continue operating controls, then undergo a separate Type II audit covering the observation period. The Type I doesn't "become" a Type II.

What if I have exceptions in my Type II?

Exceptions are documented in the report but don't necessarily prevent a clean opinion. The auditor evaluates whether exceptions are isolated incidents or systemic failures. Most Type II reports have some exceptions—customers understand this.

Do I need to renew SOC 2 every year?

Yes, for Type II. Reports cover a specific period; once that period passes, the report is historical. Customers expect current reports (typically within 12 months of issue date).