WCAG/ADA Web Accessibility Compliance
Build Inclusive Digital Experiences for Everyone
The digital world has become central to modern life encompassing work, education, commerce, healthcare, government services, entertainment, and social connection. Yet for over 1 billion people worldwide living with disabilities—approximately 15% of the global population—many digital experiences remain frustratingly inaccessible. Websites with keyboard navigation barriers, videos without captions, forms with unclear labels, insufficient color contrast, complex interfaces, and incompatibility with assistive technologies create exclusion preventing people with disabilities from full participation in digital society. Web accessibility is the practice of designing and developing digital content—websites, web applications, mobile apps, documents, multimedia—that can be used by everyone including people with visual, auditory, motor, cognitive, and neurological disabilities. Web accessibility benefits all users including older adults with age-related limitations, users of mobile devices with small screens, people with temporary disabilities (broken arm, eye surgery), and users in challenging circumstances (bright sunlight making screens hard to read, environments where audio can't be used). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), developed by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) through the Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), provide the international standard for web accessibility. WCAG defines how to make digital content perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust for all users. Currently, WCAG 2.1 (published 2018) and WCAG 2.2 (published 2023) are the recognized standards, with most organizations targeting WCAG 2.1 Level AA conformance as the baseline for accessibility compliance. In the United States, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), enacted in 1990 to prohibit discrimination against individuals with disabilities, has been interpreted by courts to apply to websites and digital properties. While the ADA doesn't specify technical requirements, courts consistently reference WCAG as the appropriate standard. Organizations face legal liability for inaccessible websites under ADA Title III (places of public accommodation) with thousands of lawsuits filed annually. Beyond ADA, Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act requires federal agencies and organizations receiving federal funding to make their electronic and information technology accessible, explicitly referencing WCAG standards. Many countries have enacted digital accessibility laws: European Union's European Accessibility Act, UK Equality Act, Canada's Accessible Canada Act, Australia's Disability Discrimination Act, and numerous others making accessibility a global legal requirement. The business case for accessibility is compelling: expanding market reach to include people with disabilities (with $13 trillion in annual disposable income globally), improving user experience for all customers, enhancing SEO and search rankings (accessible sites are more easily crawled), demonstrating corporate social responsibility and inclusive values, reducing legal risk and avoiding costly lawsuits, meeting procurement requirements (many organizations require accessibility conformance), and future-proofing digital properties for evolving technologies and user needs. Despite clear benefits and requirements, many organizations struggle with web accessibility due to lack of awareness, limited expertise, competing priorities, complex technical requirements, legacy systems and content, and misconceptions about cost and difficulty. At Glocert International, we provide expert WCAG and ADA web accessibility services helping organizations make their digital properties inclusive and compliant. Whether you're a corporation seeking to avoid ADA litigation, a government agency implementing Section 508, an educational institution ensuring equal access, or an organization committed to inclusive design, our experienced accessibility specialists guide you through comprehensive accessibility audits, remediation planning and implementation, accessible design and development, VPAT (Voluntary Product Accessibility Template) creation, user testing with people with disabilities, staff training and awareness, and ongoing accessibility monitoring. Partner with Glocert International to achieve WCAG/ADA compliance, create inclusive digital experiences, expand market reach, reduce legal risk, and demonstrate your commitment to accessibility and equality.
What is WCAG/ADA Web Accessibility?
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG)
WCAG is the international standard for web accessibility developed by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) through the Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI). WCAG provides comprehensive technical guidelines making web content accessible to people with disabilities.
WCAG Versions:
- WCAG 2.0 (2008): Original version with 12 guidelines and 61 success criteria
- WCAG 2.1 (2018): Adds 17 success criteria addressing mobile accessibility, low vision, and cognitive/learning disabilities. Backward compatible with 2.0. Currently most widely adopted
- WCAG 2.2 (2023): Adds 9 new success criteria addressing additional mobile and cognitive accessibility needs. Backward compatible with 2.1. Emerging adoption
- WCAG 3.0: Future version under development (formerly called "Silver") representing significant evolution of guidelines
Most organizations currently target WCAG 2.1 Level AA as the standard for accessibility compliance, with increasing adoption of WCAG 2.2.
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
ADA, enacted in 1990, is landmark U.S. civil rights law prohibiting discrimination against individuals with disabilities. While originally focused on physical access, courts have extended ADA to digital properties.
ADA Title III prohibits discrimination by "places of public accommodation"—businesses and organizations serving the public including retail stores, restaurants, hotels, theaters, healthcare facilities, recreation facilities, private schools, and transportation. Courts have interpreted Title III to cover websites and mobile apps of public accommodations.
ADA does not specify technical requirements for web accessibility. However, Department of Justice guidance and court decisions consistently reference WCAG as the appropriate standard. Most consent decrees and settlements require WCAG 2.1 Level AA conformance.
Section 508
Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act requires federal agencies and organizations receiving federal funding (contractors, grantees, educational institutions) to make their electronic and information technology accessible.
Section 508 Standards were updated in 2017 (effective 2018) to incorporate WCAG 2.0 Level A and Level AA success criteria. Organizations subject to Section 508 must ensure:
- Websites and web applications conform to WCAG 2.0 Level AA
- Software and mobile apps are accessible
- Electronic documents (PDFs, Word, PowerPoint) are accessible
- Hardware meets accessibility requirements
- Support documentation and services are accessible
Global Accessibility Laws
Web accessibility is increasingly mandated worldwide:
- European Union: European Accessibility Act (EAA), Web Accessibility Directive requiring WCAG 2.1 Level AA for public sector websites and mobile apps
- United Kingdom: Equality Act 2010, Public Sector Bodies Accessibility Regulations 2018
- Canada: Accessible Canada Act (ACA), provincial accessibility laws (Ontario AODA, Manitoba Accessibility Act)
- Australia: Disability Discrimination Act (DDA)
- Israel: Equal Rights for People with Disabilities Law (requiring WCAG 2.0 Level AA)
- Japan: Act on the Elimination of Discrimination against Persons with Disabilities
- Many Others: Accessibility laws exist in numerous countries with WCAG as common standard
Who Needs to Comply?
Web accessibility applies broadly:
- Public Accommodations: Businesses serving public (retail, restaurants, hotels, entertainment, healthcare, professional services) subject to ADA
- Federal Agencies: All federal government websites and applications subject to Section 508
- Federal Contractors/Grantees: Organizations doing business with federal government
- State and Local Government: Subject to ADA Title II requiring accessible digital services
- Educational Institutions: K-12 schools, colleges, universities (federal funding, ADA, Section 508)
- Financial Institutions: Banks, credit unions, financial services (ADA, specific accessibility regulations)
- Healthcare Providers: Hospitals, clinics, health plans (ADA, meaningful access requirements)
- Any Organization with Website/App: Potential ADA liability regardless of size or sector
Why Web Accessibility Matters
1. Legal Compliance and Risk Mitigation
Web accessibility is increasingly legally required, and non-compliance carries significant risks. ADA Title III lawsuits have exploded in recent years with over 4,000 federal lawsuits filed annually targeting inaccessible websites. Plaintiffs typically allege inability to access products, services, information, or transactions due to accessibility barriers. Common targets include retail websites, restaurant sites, entertainment/ticketing, hotel booking, financial services, and healthcare portals. Lawsuits result in costly settlements (typically $10,000-$100,000+ depending on organization size), legal defense costs, mandatory remediation, ongoing monitoring requirements, and negative publicity. Beyond lawsuits, Department of Justice can investigate and bring enforcement actions, demand letters from plaintiff attorneys often precede litigation, and state attorney generals can pursue accessibility violations. Organizations subject to Section 508 face compliance reviews, audit findings, and potential loss of federal contracts/grants. Proactive accessibility compliance reduces legal exposure avoiding expensive litigation and demonstrating good faith efforts to provide equal access.
2. Expanded Market Reach and Customer Base
Making digital properties accessible expands market reach to people with disabilities representing massive economic opportunity. The global population of people with disabilities exceeds 1 billion (15% of world population) with $13 trillion in annual disposable income. In the United States alone, 61 million adults live with disabilities. People with disabilities make purchasing decisions for themselves and influence household spending. Accessible websites enable this population to: browse products and services independently, complete purchases online, access account information, use online tools and calculators, consume content and media, engage with brands on social media, and access customer support. Organizations with accessible digital properties capture market share competitors miss. Accessibility also benefits broader audiences including seniors (age-related vision, hearing, dexterity limitations affect many older adults), mobile users (small screens, touch interfaces benefit from accessibility features), users with temporary disabilities (broken arm, eye infection), situational limitations (bright sunlight, noisy environment), and users with slow internet connections (accessible sites often load faster). Inclusive design expands reach maximizing total addressable market.
3. Enhanced User Experience for All
Accessibility improvements benefit all users not just people with disabilities. Accessible websites typically feature clear navigation and site structure making information easy to find, descriptive links and buttons clarifying where actions lead, sufficient color contrast improving readability for all, keyboard navigability benefiting power users and mobile users, clear language and plain writing helping all users understand content, logical heading structure aiding scanning and comprehension, form labels and error messages reducing user frustration, video captions helping users in sound-sensitive environments, and mobile responsiveness working across devices. Many accessibility features have become mainstream expectations: video captions benefit language learners and users in noisy/quiet environments, clear design and contrast help users in bright sunlight, keyboard shortcuts appeal to power users, and voice controls assist multitasking users. Accessible design is simply good design creating better experiences increasing engagement, conversion, and satisfaction for all users.
4. SEO and Search Engine Performance
Accessible websites perform better in search engine rankings. Many accessibility practices align with SEO best practices: Semantic HTML: Proper heading hierarchy, lists, landmarks help search engines understand content structure. Alt Text: Image descriptions enable search engines to index images. Descriptive Links: Meaningful link text (not "click here") provides context for search engines. Transcripts and Captions: Text alternatives for audio/video create searchable content. Mobile Responsiveness: Required for accessibility and Google ranking factor. Fast Load Times: Accessible sites often load faster (less unnecessary scripts) improving SEO. Clear Site Structure: Logical navigation aids both users and search bots. Google and other search engines cannot experience websites like human users but rely on code structure and text. Accessible markup provides clearer signals improving discoverability and ranking. Increased organic traffic from improved SEO delivers measurable ROI from accessibility investment.
5. Corporate Social Responsibility and Brand Reputation
Accessibility demonstrates organizational commitment to diversity, equity, inclusion, and social responsibility. In era of stakeholder capitalism, consumers, employees, and investors increasingly expect companies to operate ethically and inclusively. Accessible digital properties signal that organization values all people and acts on inclusion commitments. Benefits include enhanced brand reputation and customer loyalty particularly among socially conscious consumers, employee pride and engagement (staff want to work for inclusive organizations), investor appeal (ESG criteria increasingly include accessibility), positive media coverage and industry recognition, reduced risk of public backlash or "viral" accessibility failures, and competitive differentiation in crowded markets. Conversely, accessibility failures generate negative publicity, social media criticism, and reputational damage. High-profile inaccessibility incidents harm brands. Proactive accessibility builds goodwill and positive reputation.
6. Future-Proofing Digital Properties
Accessible design creates more robust, maintainable, future-proof digital properties. Accessibility requires clean, semantic code; well-structured content; separation of content and presentation; and standards compliance. These practices create sites that work across browsers and devices, adapt to new technologies (voice assistants, emerging devices), remain functional as technologies evolve, are easier to maintain and update, integrate better with third-party tools and services, and have fewer bugs and technical issues. Retrofitting accessibility into poorly coded websites is expensive. Building accessibility from the start creates technical foundation supporting long-term success and adaptation to changing technological landscape including voice interfaces, AI assistants, augmented reality, and technologies we haven't yet imagined.
7. Meeting Procurement and Partnership Requirements
Many organizations require accessibility conformance from vendors, suppliers, and partners. Federal, state, and local governments require Section 508 conformance for purchased technology. Large enterprises include accessibility requirements in RFPs and vendor agreements. Educational institutions require accessible learning management systems, course content, and administrative tools. Healthcare systems require accessible patient portals and health IT systems. Organizations unable to demonstrate accessibility conformance lose business opportunities. Requirements typically include WCAG 2.1 Level AA conformance, Voluntary Product Accessibility Template (VPAT) documenting conformance, accessibility support documentation, and commitment to maintain accessibility in updates. Proactive accessibility compliance opens doors to government contracts, enterprise sales, and partnership opportunities.
8. Educational and Ethical Imperative
Beyond legal and business justifications, accessibility is ethical imperative rooted in principles of equality, dignity, and inclusion. People with disabilities have the right to participate fully in society including digital society increasingly central to modern life. Inaccessible digital properties exclude people from employment opportunities (inaccessible job applications, workplace tools), education (inaccessible learning platforms, educational resources), healthcare (patient portals, telehealth), government services (benefits applications, voting information), commerce (online shopping, banking), and social participation (news, entertainment, social media). Digital exclusion exacerbates broader inequalities facing people with disabilities. Organizations have ethical responsibility to ensure products and services serve all people. Accessibility is not special accommodation but basic expectation in inclusive society.
Our WCAG/ADA Accessibility Services
Glocert International provides comprehensive web accessibility services ensuring your digital properties are inclusive and compliant.
Comprehensive Accessibility Audit
We conduct thorough accessibility audits evaluating your website, web application, or mobile app against WCAG 2.1/2.2 standards. Our audits combine automated testing tools, manual expert evaluation, and assistive technology testing. We assess page templates, user flows, forms and interactive elements, multimedia content, PDFs and documents, and third-party components. We deliver detailed audit report documenting all accessibility issues with WCAG success criteria violated, severity rating (critical, serious, moderate, minor), user impact description, and specific remediation guidance. Our audits provide roadmap for achieving conformance with prioritized action items and effort estimates.
Accessibility Remediation
We provide hands-on remediation services fixing accessibility issues to achieve WCAG conformance. Our accessibility specialists work with your development team or directly in your codebase implementing fixes including semantic HTML improvements, ARIA attributes for complex components, keyboard navigation enablement, focus management, color contrast corrections, alt text for images, accessible forms with proper labels and error handling, video captions and audio descriptions, screen reader compatibility, and responsive accessible design. We ensure fixes don't break existing functionality with comprehensive testing. Remediation can be phased for budget management addressing critical issues first then moderate and minor issues.
Accessible Design and Development
We help organizations build accessibility into new projects from the start avoiding costly retrofitting. Services include accessible design review and guidance, accessible UI component library creation, design system with accessibility built-in, accessible development standards and coding guidelines, accessible content templates, code review for accessibility, accessibility testing integration into CI/CD pipelines, and quality assurance including accessibility testing. Building accessibility from the beginning is more efficient and cost-effective than retrofitting delivering better user experience at lower total cost.
VPAT Creation and Conformance Reporting
We create Voluntary Product Accessibility Templates (VPATs) documenting your product's conformance with accessibility standards. VPATs are required for government procurement and enterprise sales. We evaluate your product against WCAG 2.1/2.2, Section 508, and EN 301 549 (European standard). We document level of support for each success criterion (Supports, Partially Supports, Does Not Support, Not Applicable) with explanations and limitations. We produce VPAT in standard format (ACR - Accessibility Conformance Report) widely accepted by procurement officers and accessibility professionals. VPATs demonstrate due diligence and transparency enabling informed purchase decisions.
User Testing with People with Disabilities
Technical conformance with WCAG is necessary but not sufficient—usability testing with real users with disabilities provides critical insights. We facilitate user testing sessions with people with diverse disabilities including blind users with screen readers, low vision users with magnification, users with motor impairments using keyboard only or voice control, deaf users requiring captions, users with cognitive disabilities, and users with multiple disabilities. Testing reveals real-world barriers technical audits may miss. We observe users attempting key tasks, document difficulties and barriers, collect user feedback and suggestions, and provide recommendations based on findings. User testing validates accessibility fixes ensuring digital properties truly work for intended audience.
Accessibility Training and Awareness
Sustained accessibility requires knowledgeable teams understanding responsibilities. We provide comprehensive training programs including accessibility awareness for all staff (why accessibility matters, disability types, legal landscape), accessible design for designers and UX professionals, accessible development for engineers and developers, accessible content creation for content authors and marketers, accessibility testing for QA teams, accessibility project management for product managers and project leaders, and executive briefings on accessibility strategy and ROI. Training can be delivered in-person, virtually, through e-learning modules, or via workshops. We customize content to roles, skill levels, and technology stacks. Educated teams maintain accessibility as ongoing practice preventing regression.
Document Accessibility Services
PDFs, Word documents, PowerPoint presentations, and other documents posted online must be accessible. We provide document accessibility services including accessibility assessment of existing documents, PDF remediation for accessibility (tagging, reading order, alt text), accessible template creation for Word, PowerPoint, Excel, training on creating accessible documents, accessibility checklists and job aids, and bulk document remediation for document libraries. Accessible documents ensure information available to users with screen readers and other assistive technologies critical for legal compliance particularly for government agencies and educational institutions.
Mobile App Accessibility
Native mobile apps (iOS, Android) have platform-specific accessibility requirements. We evaluate and improve mobile app accessibility including assessment against iOS accessibility guidelines (VoiceOver, Dynamic Type, etc.) and Android accessibility (TalkBack, Switch Access), implementation of accessibility features (labels, hints, traits, focus order), testing with iOS and Android assistive technologies, accessible design for mobile interactions, and mobile app VPAT creation. Mobile accessibility requires specialized expertise understanding iOS and Android accessibility APIs and testing with mobile assistive technologies.
Ongoing Accessibility Monitoring
Accessibility is not one-time project but ongoing commitment. Digital properties continuously evolve with new content, features, design updates, and third-party integrations potentially introducing new barriers. We provide ongoing accessibility monitoring including automated accessibility scans detecting issues, periodic manual audits and testing, new feature accessibility review, content accessibility checks, third-party component monitoring, accessibility regression testing, compliance dashboards and reporting, and remediation support for identified issues. Continuous monitoring ensures accessibility is maintained over time preventing regression and sustaining conformance.
WCAG Conformance Levels
WCAG organizes success criteria into three conformance levels based on impact and difficulty:
Level A (Minimum Conformance)
Level A success criteria address the most basic accessibility requirements. Failure to meet Level A creates severe barriers making content essentially impossible for some users to access. Level A includes requirements like keyboard access, text alternatives for non-text content, captions for prerecorded audio, no keyboard traps, and sufficient time to read/use content. Level A alone is generally considered insufficient for legal compliance or meaningful accessibility but represents absolute minimum.
Level AA (Standard Conformance) - Recommended Target
Level AA is the widely accepted standard for legal compliance and best practice. Most laws, regulations, policies, and settlements require Level AA conformance. Level AA includes all Level A criteria plus additional requirements addressing common barriers like minimum color contrast ratios (4.5:1 for normal text, 3:1 for large text), captions for live audio, resize text up to 200% without loss of functionality, multiple ways to navigate website, clear focus indicators, consistent navigation, labels for form inputs, on-input accessibility, and error identification/suggestion/prevention. WCAG 2.1 Level AA adds mobile-specific criteria (orientation flexibility, input modalities, motion actuation), criteria for low vision users (reflow content, spacing), and cognitive accessibility improvements. Organizations should target WCAG 2.1 Level AA as baseline accessibility standard.
Level AAA (Enhanced Conformance)
Level AAA represents highest level of accessibility including all Level A and AA criteria plus additional enhanced requirements like sign language interpretation for video, extended audio descriptions, higher contrast ratio (7:1), no interruptions unless emergency, pronunciation mechanisms, advanced reading level alternatives, and enhanced error prevention. Level AAA is very difficult to achieve for entire websites—W3C acknowledges it's not possible to satisfy all AAA criteria for all content. Level AAA is typically not required for legal compliance but may be appropriate for specific content serving populations with disabilities (assistive technology documentation, disability services sites) or for organizations pursuing accessibility excellence. Most organizations focus on Level AA with selective AAA improvements where feasible and beneficial.
Four Principles of WCAG (POUR)
WCAG is organized around four core principles—content must be Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, and Robust (POUR):
1. Perceivable
Information and user interface components must be presentable to users in ways they can perceive. Users must be able to perceive content through at least one of their senses. Key requirements include:
- Text Alternatives: Non-text content (images, icons, controls) has text alternatives (alt text) for people who cannot see images
- Captions and Alternatives for Multimedia: Prerecorded and live audio/video has captions; video has audio descriptions
- Adaptable Content: Content can be presented in different ways without losing information (screen readers can interpret semantic structure)
- Distinguishable: Content is easy to see and hear including sufficient color contrast, resizable text, no information conveyed by color alone, and user control over audio
2. Operable
User interface components and navigation must be operable by all users including those who cannot use a mouse. Key requirements include:
- Keyboard Accessible: All functionality available via keyboard (critical for blind users with screen readers and users with motor disabilities)
- Enough Time: Users have enough time to read and use content with ability to extend, pause, or turn off time limits
- Seizures and Physical Reactions: Content doesn't contain elements that flash more than three times per second (prevent seizures)
- Navigable: Users can navigate, find content, and determine where they are via page titles, focus order, link purpose, multiple navigation methods, headings and labels, and visible focus indicator
- Input Modalities: Easier operation via various inputs beyond keyboard including pointer gestures, pointer cancellation, label in name, and motion actuation
3. Understandable
Information and operation of user interface must be understandable to all users. Key requirements include:
- Readable: Text content is readable and understandable via language identification, definitions for unusual words, and reading level appropriate to audience
- Predictable: Web pages appear and operate in predictable ways with consistent navigation, consistent identification of components, no context changes without warning
- Input Assistance: Users are helped to avoid and correct mistakes via error identification, labels or instructions, error suggestions, error prevention for important transactions, context-sensitive help
4. Robust
Content must be robust enough to be interpreted reliably by wide variety of user agents including assistive technologies. Key requirements include:
- Compatible: Content is compatible with current and future user agents and assistive technologies via valid HTML, proper ARIA usage, name/role/value for custom components, and status messages announced
- Parsing: Markup can be parsed reliably (no duplicate IDs, proper nesting)
Benefits of WCAG/ADA Compliance:
Legal Protection
Reduces ADA litigation risk, demonstrates good faith compliance, and meets Section 508 requirements for government business.
Market Expansion
Reaches 1 billion people with disabilities globally, expands customer base, and captures $13 trillion disability market.
Better User Experience
Improves usability for all users, increases engagement and conversion, and reduces customer friction.
Brand Enhancement
Demonstrates social responsibility, builds positive reputation, and differentiates from competitors.
WCAG/ADA Accessibility Services Pricing
Our accessibility services pricing is transparent and based on your digital property scope, complexity, and current accessibility maturity. We offer competitive rates with no hidden fees.
Request a Quote
Get a personalized estimate based on your website, application, or digital property accessibility needs.
Contact Us for PricingWhat's Included in Accessibility Pricing:
- Comprehensive WCAG 2.1/2.2 accessibility audit
- Automated and manual testing
- Assistive technology testing (screen readers, keyboard)
- Detailed audit report with WCAG criteria mapping
- Prioritized remediation roadmap
- Remediation implementation (if requested)
- VPAT/ACR creation and documentation
- User testing coordination (if requested)
- Staff training programs
- Accessible design/development guidance
- Post-remediation validation testing
- Conformance statement preparation
- Ongoing monitoring and support (if requested)
Note: Accessibility pricing varies based on number of page templates and unique user flows, complexity of interactive components and functionality, technology stack and frameworks used, amount of multimedia content requiring captioning/descriptions, number of PDFs or documents requiring remediation, current level of accessibility (more issues = more remediation effort), whether seeking initial audit only or full remediation, mobile app inclusion (native apps require additional testing), and ongoing monitoring requirements. Contact us for a detailed, no-obligation quote tailored to your specific accessibility needs and budget.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Find answers to common questions about WCAG/ADA web accessibility compliance:
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) are international standards developed by W3C defining how to make web content accessible to people with disabilities. WCAG 2.1 (2018) and WCAG 2.2 (2023) are current versions with most organizations targeting WCAG 2.1 Level AA as baseline. WCAG matters because it's legal requirement (ADA, Section 508, global accessibility laws reference WCAG), represents best practices for inclusive design, expands market reach to people with disabilities, improves user experience for all users, enhances SEO and search rankings, demonstrates corporate social responsibility, and meets procurement requirements. WCAG organized around four principles (POUR): Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust. Three conformance levels: A (minimum), AA (standard - recommended), AAA (enhanced). Courts, regulators, and organizations worldwide recognize WCAG as appropriate accessibility standard.
Yes, courts have consistently ruled that ADA applies to websites particularly for places of public accommodation (Title III). While ADA statute predates widespread internet use and doesn't explicitly mention websites, courts interpret "place of public accommodation" to include websites enabling access to goods and services. Department of Justice has issued guidance stating entities covered by ADA must ensure websites are accessible. ADA doesn't specify technical standards but DOJ guidance and court settlements consistently reference WCAG 2.1 Level AA as appropriate standard. Organizations facing ADA website lawsuits include retail, restaurants, hotels, entertainment/ticketing, healthcare, financial services, and many others. Lawsuits typically allege specific barriers preventing access (inability to navigate with keyboard/screen reader, forms without labels, videos without captions, insufficient contrast). Consequences include costly settlements ($10K-$100K+), legal fees, mandatory remediation, ongoing monitoring, negative publicity. Proactive WCAG compliance reduces ADA risk demonstrating good faith effort to provide equal access. While legal landscape continues evolving, trend is clear: digital accessibility is ADA requirement for businesses and organizations.
Section 508 of Rehabilitation Act requires federal agencies and organizations receiving federal funding to make electronic and information technology accessible to people with disabilities. Section 508 Standards (updated 2017, effective 2018) incorporate WCAG 2.0 Level A and AA. Who must comply: All federal government agencies, federal contractors and subcontractors, organizations receiving federal grants or assistance, and educational institutions receiving federal funding. Covered technology includes websites and web applications, software and mobile apps, electronic documents (PDFs, Word, PowerPoint), hardware (computers, phones, kiosks), and support documentation and services. Section 508 enforced through procurement requirements (vendors must demonstrate conformance), complaint process (individuals can file complaints), and agency audits by Office of Management and Budget and agency CIOs. Non-compliance can result in loss of federal contracts/grants, procurement disqualification, and remediation requirements. Organizations selling to federal government typically must provide VPAT (Voluntary Product Accessibility Template) documenting conformance. Section 508 requirements broader than many organizations realize—federal funding includes Medicare/Medicaid reimbursement (healthcare), federal student aid (educational institutions), research grants, and many other funding streams making Section 508 applicable to thousands of organizations beyond federal agencies.
WCAG 2.1 Level AA is the widely accepted standard and recommended target for most organizations. Level A addresses only most severe barriers—insufficient for meaningful accessibility or legal compliance. Level AA includes all Level A plus additional critical requirements including color contrast, captions for live audio, resizable text, multiple navigation methods, form labels, and mobile accessibility. Most laws, regulations, and policies require Level AA (Section 508, DOJ guidance, court settlements, EU accessibility directive). Level AA strikes balance between comprehensive accessibility and feasibility for most content and functionality. Level AAA represents highest accessibility but very difficult to achieve across entire website—W3C acknowledges not all AAA criteria can be met for all content. Most organizations focus on Level AA with selective AAA where beneficial (higher contrast for vision-focused sites, sign language for specific content). Recommendation: Target WCAG 2.1 Level AA as baseline with plan to adopt WCAG 2.2 Level AA as it becomes more widely referenced (WCAG 2.2 backward compatible with 2.1). Consider Level AAA for specific content serving users with disabilities or for competitive differentiation. Regardless of target level, conduct user testing with people with disabilities to validate that conformance translates to usability.
No, accessibility overlays are not sufficient for legal compliance and are not recommended by accessibility professionals. Overlays are third-party widgets/plugins claiming to make websites accessible via automated fixes and user customization options (adjust colors, fonts, reading modes). Problems with overlays: Cannot address all accessibility issues (overlays can't fix complex problems requiring design/code changes), often introduce new barriers or break existing functionality, provide poor user experience for assistive technology users (many overlay features conflict with users' configured assistive technologies), create false sense of compliance (organizations believe they're accessible when underlying issues remain), do not protect from lawsuits (plaintiffs and courts recognize overlays as insufficient—many lawsuits filed against sites with overlays), and face opposition from disability community (advocacy groups published statements against overlays). Legal perspective: Courts examine underlying code and user experience, not presence of overlay. Consent decrees and settlements require actual remediation, not overlays. Overlay vendors' claims about compliance should be viewed skeptically. Recommended approach: Conduct proper accessibility audit identifying issues, implement fixes to underlying code and content, test with assistive technologies and users with disabilities, and provide accessibility statement. There are no shortcuts to accessibility—it requires commitment to inclusive design and development. Overlays may have limited value for specific features (e.g., providing additional contrast options) but should never be only or primary accessibility strategy.
Accessible PDFs critical for compliance as PDFs posted on websites fall under accessibility requirements. Key requirements: Proper Tagging: PDF must be tagged with semantic structure (headings, lists, tables) enabling screen readers to navigate. Reading Order: Tags must be in logical reading order. Alternative Text: Images need alt text descriptions. Form Fields: Forms need labels, tooltips, and tab order. Tables: Must have header rows/columns identified. Language: Document language specified. Bookmarks/TOC: For long documents, bookmarks aid navigation. OCR: Scanned PDFs need OCR for text recognition. Color Contrast: Sufficient contrast for text and important graphics. Accessible Creation: Best approach is create accessible PDF from source (Word, InDesign) using accessibility features during export. Word: Use styles for headings, alt text for images, table headers, descriptive links. Export to tagged PDF. InDesign: Set up proper structure, tag elements, export as tagged PDF. PDF Remediation: For existing PDFs, use Adobe Acrobat Pro's accessibility tools to add tags, set reading order, add alt text, define form fields. For large document libraries, consider professional remediation services. Testing: Test with Adobe's accessibility checker, screen readers (JAWS, NVDA), keyboard navigation. Note: Some PDF features inherently problematic for accessibility (complex forms, heavy interactivity)—consider HTML alternatives for complex content.
Assistive technology testing critical for accessibility validation. Key assistive technologies: Screen Readers: JAWS (Job Access With Speech) - most popular commercial screen reader for Windows. NVDA (NonVisual Desktop Access) - free, open-source Windows screen reader. VoiceOver - built-in screen reader for macOS, iOS. TalkBack - built-in screen reader for Android. Test key user flows: navigation, forms, interactive components, multimedia. Keyboard Only: Test complete site using only keyboard (no mouse) ensuring all functionality reachable, focus visible, logical tab order, and no keyboard traps. Screen Magnification: ZoomText, Windows Magnifier, macOS Zoom. Test at 200% magnification ensuring content reflows, no loss of functionality. Voice Control: Dragon NaturallySpeaking, Windows Voice Control, macOS Voice Control. Test navigation and interaction via voice commands. Browser Extensions: Color contrast analyzers, WAVE toolbar, Axe DevTools. Testing Strategy: Combine automated testing (catches ~30-40% of issues), manual expert review (catches technical issues automated tools miss), and assistive technology testing (validates real-world usability). Ideally, conduct user testing with actual people with disabilities using their own assistive technologies and workflows—provides most authentic validation of accessibility. Different assistive technologies have different behaviors—test with multiple to ensure broad compatibility.
Accessibility remediation costs vary significantly based on multiple factors: Website Size/Complexity: Small brochure site (10-20 pages, simple design): $5K-$15K. Medium marketing/ecommerce site (50-100 pages, some interaction): $15K-$50K. Large enterprise site (100+ pages, complex functionality): $50K-$200K+. Web application with custom components: $50K-$500K+ depending on complexity. Current Accessibility State: Sites with many existing issues require more remediation effort. Well-coded modern sites may need only moderate fixes. Legacy sites with poor code quality more expensive to remediate. Type of Issues: Color contrast and alt text relatively quick to fix. Complex interactive components (custom dropdowns, date pickers, data tables) require significant development. Keyboard accessibility for complex interactions time-consuming. Third-party components may require replacement if not fixable. Approach: Phased remediation can spread costs over time: Phase 1 (critical issues), Phase 2 (moderate), Phase 3 (minor). Ongoing Costs: New content/features must maintain accessibility. Training staff to create accessible content. Periodic audits and monitoring ($5K-$20K annually). Cost vs. Risk: Remediation costs less than ADA lawsuit settlements ($50K-$500K+ including legal fees). Lost business from inaccessible site (1 billion people with disabilities). Reputational damage from accessibility failures. Best Approach: Build accessibility into development from start—far less expensive than retrofitting. Invest in staff training creating accessibility culture.
Remediation timeline depends on scope and approach: Audit Phase: Small site audit (10-20 pages): 1-2 weeks. Medium site audit (50-100 pages): 2-4 weeks. Large site/application audit: 4-8+ weeks. Remediation Phase: Small site with moderate issues: 4-8 weeks. Medium site with significant issues: 3-6 months. Large site/complex application: 6-12+ months. Factors Affecting Timeline: Number and severity of issues found, development team capacity and accessibility knowledge, complexity of fixes required (simple issues vs. component redesign), testing and validation time, stakeholder review and approval cycles, content remediation (alt text for hundreds of images, video captioning). Phased Approach: Many organizations phase remediation for faster initial results: Phase 1 (Critical - 2-3 months): Keyboard access, screen reader compatibility, form labels, color contrast for key pages/flows. Phase 2 (Important - 2-3 months): Remaining moderate issues, additional page templates. Phase 3 (Minor - 2-3 months): Minor issues, polish, edge cases. Phasing delivers progressive improvement allowing partial accessibility quickly while working toward full conformance. Urgent Remediation: If facing lawsuit or immediate deadline, focused remediation of critical paths (homepage, purchase flow, key services) possible in 4-8 weeks. Best Practice: Allow adequate time for thorough remediation and testing—rushed remediation may miss issues. Plan for accessibility from beginning of projects avoiding remediation altogether.
Glocert International provides comprehensive accessibility services: Accessibility audits evaluating websites, web apps, mobile apps against WCAG 2.1/2.2 with detailed reports and remediation roadmaps; Remediation services fixing accessibility issues to achieve conformance; Accessible design/development building accessibility into new projects from start; VPAT creation documenting conformance for procurement; User testing with people with disabilities validating real-world usability; Training programs for designers, developers, content creators, QA teams; Document accessibility for PDFs, Word, PowerPoint; Mobile app accessibility for iOS and Android; Ongoing monitoring maintaining accessibility over time; Legal support for ADA demand letters/lawsuits. Our team brings accessibility expertise including IAAP-certified accessibility professionals (CPACC, WAS), experience with WCAG 2.1/2.2, Section 508, ADA requirements, assistive technology testing (JAWS, NVDA, VoiceOver, TalkBack), accessible design and development practices, and experience across industries (retail, healthcare, education, government, finance). We've helped organizations of all sizes achieve accessibility compliance from small businesses to Fortune 500 companies. We understand both technical requirements and business realities helping you achieve compliance efficiently and cost-effectively while creating genuinely inclusive digital experiences.
Why Choose Glocert for WCAG/ADA Compliance?
Accessibility Expertise and Certification
Glocert International specializes in web and digital accessibility, bringing deep expertise in WCAG 2.1 and 2.2 guidelines, ADA Title III requirements, Section 508 standards, international accessibility regulations, assistive technology testing and compatibility, accessible design principles and patterns, accessible development techniques and ARIA, and accessibility testing methodologies. Our team includes IAAP-certified professionals (CPACC - Certified Professional in Accessibility Core Competencies, WAS - Web Accessibility Specialist) ensuring work meets professional standards. We stay current with evolving accessibility standards, legal landscape, assistive technologies, and best practices through continuous education, industry participation, and real-world project experience.
Comprehensive Assessment and Remediation
We provide thorough accessibility evaluation combining multiple testing approaches: automated testing (identifying technical issues efficiently), manual expert review (catching issues automation misses), assistive technology testing (screen readers, keyboard, magnification), and user testing with people with disabilities (validating real-world usability). Our detailed audit reports document every accessibility issue mapped to specific WCAG success criteria with severity ratings, user impact descriptions, and specific remediation guidance with code examples. Beyond audits, we provide hands-on remediation implementing fixes to achieve conformance, validating fixes through retesting, and delivering accessible, maintainable code.
Business and Legal Understanding
We understand accessibility in business context—not just technical requirements but legal risks, market opportunities, budget constraints, and organizational challenges. Our approach balances legal compliance with practical business needs, prioritizes critical issues for maximum impact and risk reduction, phases remediation to manage costs and deliver progressive improvement, leverages cost-effective strategies and tools, and provides clear ROI communication for stakeholder buy-in. For organizations facing ADA lawsuits or demand letters, we provide expert support including assessment and remediation planning, representation in settlement negotiations, implementation of accessibility improvements, ongoing monitoring and compliance validation, and documentation for legal counsel.
Training and Sustainable Accessibility
One-time remediation insufficient without organizational commitment to maintaining accessibility. We provide comprehensive training programs building accessibility capability: role-based training for designers, developers, content creators, QA testers, product managers; hands-on workshops with real examples from your projects; accessible design systems and component libraries; accessibility guidelines and checklists tailored to your technology stack; and integration of accessibility into development processes. Educated teams prevent accessibility issues in new features maintaining compliance and avoiding costly re-remediation.
Related Services
Organizations pursuing accessibility often need complementary services. Glocert International also provides ISO 27001 certification for information security (accessible sites must also be secure), penetration testing and security assessments, GDPR compliance and privacy consulting, usability testing and UX research, and quality assurance and testing services. We coordinate multiple engagements for comprehensive digital quality covering accessibility, security, privacy, and usability in integrated approach avoiding duplicate efforts and ensuring consistency across compliance programs.
Build Inclusive Digital Experiences
Contact us today to learn more about our WCAG/ADA web accessibility services and how we can help you create accessible digital experiences for everyone.
Request a QuoteCutting-Edge Solutions
Choose Glocert for innovative TIC solutions at the forefront of modern technology